Coal Mining in Semirara Island...I don't want this to happen to Catanduanes

kurdapya's picture

PDI Western Visayas

ILOILO CITY – Residents of Semirara Island in Antique are calling on the government to stop the alleged pollution of their coastal resources from coal mining on the island.

The residents of Sitio Bigo of Barangay Alegria, one of the three villages of the island, have sought the help of environmental groups after the alleged pollution continued despite a letter sent to Environment Secretary Jose “Lito” Atienza in September last year.

“We have sought action from local officials and repeatedly called the attention of the company. But the problem persists,” said Barangay Captain Ronald Lavega of Alegria in a telephone interview with the INQUIRER on Thursday.

The residents said coastal resources including mangroves have died or have been contaminated by wastes coming from the coal washing plant of the Semirara Mining Co. (SMC).

SMC officials have not responded to a request from the INQUIRER for a statement or reaction on the allegations.
SMC has been operating one of the biggest coal mines in Asia for more than 20 years on the 5,500-hectare Semirara Island.

Semirara is one of the nine islands comprising Caluya town in Antique at the northern end of Panay Island.

The letter signed by about 100 residents said their livelihood has been affected because the coal wastes have contaminated the water and marine resources, said Lavega.

“A wide area of our seas where we depend for our livelihood is slowly being destroyed because hectares of our mangroves and seagrass are slowly dying,” they said in their petition.

Silt has covered their coastline and mangroves as waste coming from the company’s coal washing plant goes directly to the sea because the siltation pond has not been operational for a long time, the petition said.

The washing plant removes soil and rock coal before it is utilized or marketed.

Lavega said mangrove trees have already died because the silt that has covered the waters has reached more than a foot deep.

Barangay Alegria has around 1,300 residents, most of them affected by the alleged contamination of the coastline and marine resources.

The residents asked the DENR to help them by transferring or repairing the coal washing plant.
They also sought the rehabilitation of affected areas, and alternative livelihood for the residents.

They also sought indemnification from the company and other measures provided by the law.

Reached by phone on Friday, Atienza said he was unaware of the issue but said he would look into it.

Lavega said around five hectares of mangroves have been affected. But he alleged that last week, the company bulldozed the area with the dead and dying mangroves and planted it with coconut trees.

A sign declaring the area off limits to residents has also been put up, according to Lavega.

“They do not want the public to see the dead mangroves and we have not been allowed to go near the area because it is already guarded,” said Lavega.

The island is host to 21 mangrove species or 60 percent of the total 35 species of mangroves in the country, according to scientists specializing on mangroves.
The mangroves and marine resources are still recovering from a massive oil spill that hit the area in December 2005.

Around 113 hectares of mangrove forests were contaminated after 364,120 liters of bunker fuel were spilled off the coast of Semirara after a power barge of the National Power Corp. ran aground 200 meters from the island.

Dear Mr. Macenas, I am

Dear Mr. Macenas,

I am Rogelio del Rosario, Jr. , a senior geologist from the Department of Energy (DOE). You were right that the DOE has awarded a coal operating contract (COC) to Monte Oro Resources & Energy Inc. (MOREI) on November 2005 to explore the seven thousand hectares of lands located within the municipalities of Caramoran, Panganiban & San Andres. Right now the contract is nearing to its full term (2 years exploration + 2 years extension as prescribed by PD 972 otherwise known as Coal Operating Contract System and will expire on November 2009. During this period they have the option either to proceed to development/production (D/P) if they will be able to block a reserve sufficient for mining or relinquished back the said coal blocks if the said reserves does not qualifies for mining. You were right also in saying that MOREI is in the process of evaluating the results of the geological, drilling, trenching and test pitting activities they have done so far in the COC area in order to determine if the reserve will be okey for mining. They need to submit this evaluation report to DOE for technical evaluation and if the DOE sees that the establish reserve is feasible for mining then that is the time that their COC-exploration will be converted to D/P and they will be required to submit a five year development plan. But prior to conversion to D/P, they need to secure first an ECC from the DENR. Securing an ECC as we know is a through and lengthy process which the proponent need to undergoes before doing a project in the province. It is this time that all concerns and issues related to the said project will be answered and addressed upon. It is also this time that all the stakeholders, LGUs, NGOs, religious, concerned groups, etc. will be consulted and to be ask if they are in favor or not with the project. In the end the decision will lies to our fellow Catanduenon whether coal mining in Catanduanes will prosper or not.

Since the awarding of COC last November 2005, the DOE technical team have been doing frequent monitoring of all exploration activities by MOREI in compliance with the approved work program and as far as I'm concerned what they are doing are all purely exploration activities geared for the eventual blocking of coal reserves not mining as what is circulating nowadays in the entire province. I guess the people are misinformed and have jumped to conclusion that MOREI is now mining the coal in the COC area. My fellow province mate this is not true and I can attest to this since I have been there in the nose of MOREI since the day one of their contract with the DOE.

I guess the misconception of MOREI is mining the coal started in the illegal hauling of coal stockpiled in the Camp Ermitano area and the magnetite sand in Bagamanoc. I won't be speaking on the magnetite sand mining issue in Bagamanoc since that commodity rests on the Bureau of Mines. I will be commenting on the coal since the matter falls within the domain of DOE. For the information of everybody that coal was not mined by MOREI but was the product of the mining activities done by the CANARDECO during the 70s. Based from our source, it is one of the relatives of the former mining operator (and I'm not in the position to tell) who facilitated the hauling and sale of the coal in the Camp Ermitano area. It is not only the DOE that has been robbed of the shares from the sales but the LGUs as well of the province and town having jurisdiction over the former coal stockpile. I guess the decision of filing or pursuing the case for this matter now rest to DOE as we have already done our part as technical in documenting the said incident.

With regards to the issues that come out in the previous forum of associating the extent of environmental damages based on the awarded blocks of 7,000 hectares, I think that allegation is not properly correct and don't have technical basis. The usual approach in exploration is that it started with larger area and end up zeroing a small area. I agree with you that not all the blocks that have been awarded to MOREI will be mined entirely by the company. As I said previously, MOREI is still in the exploration stage. They have just gone through with geological mapping quantifying and determining the various lithological units (rock types) in the COC area. Catanduanes Island rests on volcano-metamorphic basement rocks which are not coal bearing. Results of geological mapping had shown that most of their blocks have this type of lithological units and won't be the subject anymore of future activities. They have concentrated their activities within the Malabog-Ubi area wherein they will be able to drill 10 shallow drill holes to prove the sub lateral persistencies of the identified coal seams. Drilling results pinpointed a discontinuous and structurally disturbed (faulted) coal seams. Again you were right in saying that such deposit could not be subjected to an open pit/cast mining which is said to be environmentally destructive and qualifies for an underground mining method in order to be technically feasible and commercially viable. Further during the conversion process, MOREI will relinquished the blocks that are non-coal bearing and will retain only those blocks containing coal. Thus the above assumption is baseless and unfounded.

There are still so many issues that needs to be answered and pardon me coz I don't have the luxury of time. I can only answer the things that I know and could not go on further on the other issues especially those that concerned my agency. What I have written here does not reflect the official position of the DOE.

Thank for allowing me to present my view in this forum. Good day!

Rogelio A. del Rosario, Jr.

para sana sa sainyo an

eman's picture

I won't be speaking on the magnetite sand mining issue in Bagamanoc since that commodity rests on the Bureau of Mines. I WILL BE COMMENTNG ON THE COAL SINCE THE MATTER FALLS WITHIN THE DOMAIN OF doe. - Rogelio A. del Rosario, Jr.

Comment:

HUGAS KAMAY este hawak kamay
- by: yeng constantino

For the information of everybody that coal was not mined by MOREI but was the product of the mining activities done by the CANARDECO during the 70s. Based from our source, it is one of the relatives of the former mining operator (and I'm not in the position to tell) who facilitated the hauling and sale of the coal in the Camp Ermitano area. It is not only the DOE that has been robbed of the shares from the sales but the LGUs as well of the province and town having jurisdiction over the former coal stockpile. - Rogelio A. del Rosario, Jr.

I GUESS THE DECISION OF FILLING OR PURSUING THE CASE FOR THIS MATTER NOW REST TO THE doe AS WE HAVE ALREADY GONE OUR PART AS TECHNICAL IN DOCUMENTING THE SAID INDCIDENT.. - Rogelio A. del Rosario, Jr.

Ah kala ko may kakampi na tayong taga DOE la rin pala.

Securing an ECC as we know is a through and lengthy process which the proponent need to undergoes before doing a project in the province. It is this time that all concerns and issues related to the said project will be answered and addressed upon. It is also this time that all the stakeholders, LGUs, NGOs, religious, concerned groups, etc. will be consulted and to be ask if they are in favor or not with the project. In the end the decision will lies to our fellow Catanduenon whether coal mining in Catanduanes will prosper or not. - Rogelio A. del Rosario, Jr.

HAHAHA (kitikon mo daw ako sabi ni ukag).
Dae ngani kami Ning tiwala sa DOE, DENR, BRUEAU OF MINES, ki GOV., Ki CONG., sa magkapilang MAYOR.(mga MONEY MONEY lang) Mahalat pa kami ning consultation.!!!!! Harharhar

I think that allegation is not properly correct and don't have technical basis. - Rogelio A. del Rosario, Jr.

- Technicalities!!!!
para sana sa sainyo an!!!

NO TO COAL MINING IN CATANDUANES

Better late than never...

man-uukag's picture

Basta ako ang alam ko:
Hangga't hindi napuputol ang huling natitirang kahoy,
hangga't hindi nahuhuli ang huling natitirang isda,
hangga't hindi natutuyo ang huling natitirang ilog,
... saka lamang matatanto ng sangkatauhan...
NA HINDI TAYO MABUBUHAY NG PERA LAMANG!!!

walk your talk

Firstly, I owe JOM and the forumers an introduction, my name is Melvin Purzuelo and I maintain the Tulayhawan's blog, http://tulayhawan.wordpress.com, where several items on the semirara coal mines pollution issues are posted. For more info, may I refer you to this PDI article: http://services.inquirer.net/print/print.php?article_id=21406

Kurdapya's post: "Coal Mining in Semirara Island...I don't want this to happen to Catanduanes" got my attention that is why I volunteered my link in this forum.

The burden to prove their being "responsible" rests on the coal mining industry. How can they assure the people of Catanduanes that these destructive practices will not happen?

If the industry is serious on the "sustainable and responsible mining" rhetoric then it should showcase this in Semirara now rather than cover this pathetically by discrediting environmental groups and (with DENR's collaboration) misleading even institutions like the PSE (http://www.pse.com.ph/html/disclosure/pdf/2009/pdf/dc2009-1357_SCC.pdf).

The residents of Semirara Island in Antique called on DENR Secretary Atienza to stop the pollution by transferring or repairing the coal washing plant, rehabilitate the affected areas, provide alternative livelihoods and indemnify the affected communities. These are legitimate issues not "hysterical fuss and noise."

Having been asked to help by the residents of Brgy. Alegria we have approached the EMB/DENR and the provincial government of Antique to conduct a scientific investigation with the UP-Visayas and UP Marine Science Institute. However, the response of the company is militarization and harassment even of Alegria's barangay captain.

We challenge the industry to "walk your talk!" Until then, there's no point opening other communities like Catanduanes to threats of similar ecological disasters.

Coal mining in Catanduanes

ANDY VITALICIO's picture

I just wanna see how you guys will react when one day you suddenly hear that fresh coal is being shipped out of Virac pier by the tons. Before it's too late, let's go ask our relatives and friends in Catanduanes if mining has really started, because I hear the DOE has signed a contract with some firm called Monte Oro to mine coal, not just explore. And the sites are thousands of hectares of precious forested mountains in the Caramoran-Calolbon boundary, and in Panganiban. Please, if you know anything more, send me an email. Or just let everyone know, so we can move before we start seeing worse calamities in our midst. God bless Catanduanes!

Catanduanes Coal project

Jorge O. Macenas's picture

Hi Andy! It’s been a long time! How are you?

Monte Oro was awarded the concession to explore the coal deposit in Catanduanes. From what I heard, the exploration has been completed. The project is being evaluated for its economic potential which will determine whether to proceed to development stage and eventually operate the mine. The project will need a Coal Operating Contract (COC) to develop and operate the mine.

To the Oppositors of the mining project, this is the right time to file a motion to oppose and prevent the issuance of COC.

Way back in the 80’s, I’m was a member of a team which undertook an evaluation of the coal potential of Payo Caramoran area. The coal deposits are of sub bituminous B to anthracite type with up to +12,000 BTU. These are high grade coal similar to Malangas and Cebu deposits.

The main challenge is the small recoverable reserve known at the time due to limited drilling done. The coal deposit formations are of vertical shafting type which is not suitable for open pit mining but applicable to the more expensive and less productive tunneling method.

Should the project push through, possible loading point is not Virac Pier but somewhere in the vicinity of Caramoran.

While Monte Oro was awarded a concession to explore thousand of hectares of land, it doesn’t mean the entire area will be mined, denude the forest and lay to waste the entire concession area. Mining activity will be confined in the mineralized area which could be 10% or less of the concession area. Considering the non viability of open pit mining, possibility of forest denudation is very minimal.

I would say the money making river dredging projects did more damage than a coal mining operation will do.

How I will react if I see tons of coal being shipped out Virac pier? Well, I will advise the driver to be careful with his driving because the coal he is hauling is vital in running our economy.

SEMIRARA NEWS

Jorge O. Macenas's picture

Before getting excited about the article, let us take a closer look.

The news is still in an allegation stage – meaning it has to be investigated and ascertained if there is truth into the ALLEGATION.

Coal washing is a process of removing non coal particles such as mud, sand and other inorganic matters. using water. The water run off containing silt and other natural fine particles are directed into a settling pond before flowing into the sea.

Settling pond is a series of containment ponds where silt and other fine particles are allowed to settle down from the coal washing water run off before flowing back into the sea using gravity. The containment ponds need to be dredged regularly to minimize silt accumulation and allow unimpeded flow of water.

Curiously, the letter was signed by 100 residents. What happened and Where are the other 1,200 residents?

The ALLEGATION may have truth into it, nevertheless, people must be reminded of, as it happened in the past, professional agitators behind the action of minority who are making disproportionate noise. These were mostly fund raising.

The inclusion of oil spill from power barge of the National Power Corp. is a poor attempt to cast a scenario of catastrophic contamination in the area parallel to the coal mining activity. Please note the oil spill happened when the power barge ran aground because of bad weather. With or with out mining, a worse oil spill happened in Guimaras and may happen anywhere including Catanduanes.

Semirara mining has been going on for more than twenty years. Millions of tons of coal and overburden are extracted annually. For such a small island, why is it not wiped off the map yet as most anti mining advocate has been predicting an apocalyptic end result?

hello!

burabod_bato's picture

if we will try to feel the sentiments of these residents and those concerned about that said coal mining, its a feeling of LOVE that enforces them to cry their own feelings. we cannot simply ignore them for what they are fighting for is the LOVE that they have felt from the very start of their existence in Catanduanes. yes, it is true that this said mining can be a great help in our economy but the question is until when will it lasts. im not trying to combat your explanation but im just trying to voice out whatever i felt after reading your posted comment. you know what really matters today is the future of our province especially for us young genrations. come to think also of the next generations. thank you! God Bless You!

No to mining people

amore's picture

hello burabod_bato,

Hayan, sana masabutan nyo tabi an,,, ang mga generations kawawa pagdating ng araw pag pig mina ang catanduanes.. mag-isip kamo ning milyones kung makaka-perwisyo kayo sa mga susunod na generation.... wag puro pera paiiralin.. ang impact ay walang katapusang pag-hihirap pa rin ang mararanasan dahil sa mga dumarating na disasters.. paano na lng kung miminahon nyo pa???????

Mag-isip isip tabi... ang utak pairalin...

Mabalos...

NO TO MINING !!!

May your troubles be less, Your blessings be more, And nothing but happiness come through your door.

semirara ecological disaster

please check the following link for pictures of the ecological disaster in semirara:
http://tulayhawan.wordpress.com/2009/03/26/semirara-disaster/

salamat

Ano Daw?

Jorge O. Macenas's picture

ECOLOGICAL DISASTER !!

These words evokes memories of Exxon Valdez, Guimaras oil Spill, or even the present state of Manila Bay.

The so called “ecological disaster” includes a banca that needs long overdue scrubbing, discolored cottonii variety seaweeds (I saw similar seaweed discoloration in Cagayancillo Islands, Sulu Sea during rainy season), arms full of kurikong( soap and water may help), thin film of coal dust/residues along the settling pond embankment (where else?), bulldozed areas where coconuts still grow and smoking power plant obviously generating power for the entire island.

Is it an ecological disaster or simply making a big MOUNTAIN out of a MOLEHILL?

Granting for the sake of argument, it is an ecological disaster which necessitates the closure of the coal mine. What alternatives are being suggested? Unfortunately there is no alternative being proposed at all.

If coal mining is banned in our country, who will supply the coal requirements of coal fired power plant in Calaca Batangas, Naga Cebu, Pagbilao, Quezon, the cement factories, the foundries and other coal dependent industries. What options do they have?

Are the million of consumers willing to pay higher power cost in exchange for the few hectares of seaweeds farm?

Are we willing to risk national economic security thru overdependence on imported coal which could be choked off any time in exchange for the prevention of so called “ecological disaster”?

Please share your thoughts.

Ano Daw? @ JOM

Despite the cover of "sustainable" and "responsible" mining, your comments betray your "ruthless and futureless growth" paradigm.

While an "ecological disaster" could be relative (in scope and intensity) but you derisively dismissed pictures showing 490 hectares of coral reefs / sea grasses and 190 hectares of mangroves destroyed. This case is only in Barangay Alegria not counting the hundreds of hectares of mangroves, seagrasses, and coral reefs destroyed in Brgys. Tinugbok and Semirara.

Rather than sacrifice a "few" hundred families, this could have been an opportunity for the industry to show what "responsible and sustainable mining" means.

The questions for Catanduanes are: development for whom? and whose families, farmlands, beaches and fishing grounds will be sacrificed for the sake of "growth"?

Ruthless and Futureless

Jorge O. Macenas's picture

I find the exchange of opinions very interesting.

It will be relevant if participants use their real identities which is the true essence of responsible Forum discussion. In previous Catanduanes forum discussion, participants using cyber names tend to be over passionate losing focus on main issue and shifting to personal matters instead. We must not repeat the same mistake in CF.

I respect your opinion if you consider my advocacy a “cover” and my comments as “ruthless and futureless growth” paradigm. I consider my advocacy of sustainable and responsible mining as pragmatic, my point of views as logical and practical.

The pictures posted in the web about so called “ecological disaster” brought about by Semirara Coal mining operation speaks for itself. A banca which needs long overdue scrubbing, a skin disease, and a smokestack of coal fired power plant, a blue colored cottonii seaweeds do not substantiate ecological disaster no matter how relative the words may mean. If there is a so called “ecological disaster” in Semirara, it must be substantiated, validated and map out a solution.

Rather than hysterically makes fuss and noise about the so called ecological disaster, ecology advocates should coordinate and cooperate with all interest holders in the island towards a solution.

This could be an opportunity for ecology advocates to show what "responsible and sustainable advocacy" means.
Pointing out the problem and yet not being part of the solution is a bigger disaster. The call to close the coal mining operation without putting forward viable alternative source of strategic fuel is economic suicide.

The questions for Catanduanes are: development for whom? whose families, farmlands, beaches and fishing grounds will be sacrificed for the sake of "growth"?

This question can be better answered by fellow Catandunganons who will directly benefits from or affected by the coal mining operation there. Better see for yourself and visit Camp Ermitanyo where actual coal mining took place during World War 2 and in the late 60’s.

Ano Daw@ JOM

Dave's picture

I have been listening on the sideline on this issue.

My stand...

We may not have a current answer as to what alternative solution there maybe if the mining is closed. However, I agree that this world has to be protected. Any slight sign of ecological devastation, however minute, is a sign we have to stop the cause! If it is the mining that causes those, that has to stop as well. Food on the table for can be had somewhere else where the ecology will be protected.

What is that food source? Let's rock our head and provide answers. Meanwhile I believe there is a cause to be disturbed.

Dave

Bahala si Santa Claus

Jorge O. Macenas's picture

You don’t discard your winter jacket you are wearing now without a ready replacement simply because the jacket is dirty. The options are froze to death or survive with dirty but functional jacket.

To say we can get food from somewhere else without clear idea where the alternate source of food will be coming from is a fatalistic sense of “bahala na si santa claus” attitude. We should not leave our lives to chances.

Advocacy of environmental preservation is a noble cause. I’m one with them and this is the reason why I’m endorsing sustainable mining as alternative not an outright mining ban.

Bad Day For Santa Claus

ilaya's picture

With the destructive effect of mining it is putting the lives of people and environment to chances. Mining disasters happened before and there is no watertight safety to prevent it's occurence. It can be manmade and be by force of mother earth. Why put our beloved Catanduanes in jeopardy by destroying it's geologic integrity and natural environment? Mining is not the answer for the island economic sustainability. Generations has survived centuries of storms and typhoons and live the island without the benefit of mining. Leave Catanduanes and never touch it by mining. Burning coal for power is the biggest polluter of our planet. The threat of global warming is on high ALERT as the effect of this manmade pollution. People now must start looking for alternatives to coal to stop this global warming. Walk the talk for environmental advocacy not just lip service. No more coal mining!!! No to Catanduanes Mining!!!There are more alternatives to coal and energy and economic and environmental sustainability. NO TO BAHALA NA!!! STOP VESTED INTEREST!!! NO MORE VESTED VIEWS!!!NO TO THE GREED OF THE FEW!!!CATADUNGANONS CAN LIVE SA KAMONTE AT KUYOG AT LATO SANA!!!

gud day!

burabod_bato's picture

i think what is at stake here is nothing else but the island itself of Catanduanes. we will never allow to sacrifice our beloved island for the sake of just temporary gains and incentives. yes, it is true that we are experiencing poverty but the question is, "is mining the only solution to solve the economic crisis. we must always bear in mind that our solution must always be for the common good not for a selected few. if indeed you're one of the advocates of environmental preservation you must think twice in considering mining as the possible and most easy solution to our problems. by the way, its not the environment that we are fighting for but the right of every people of catanduanes. thank you!
ejr

STOP MINING!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!

ELVIERHOSE RODRIGUEZ's picture

Ang mining kc 60% magayon ang income if ever ma-implented yon sa catanduanes pero temporary lng yan na mararanasan nyo dahil unti unting titibagin ang catanduanes sa paglandslide. Ngata pa nita halaton na mangyari yon?

Instead of that, we are all from catanduanes to protect our province.

So, for those who wants to join in mining works... Please stop it.... Love your province as love yourself... dyan kita magdakula wag hayaan na maging isang tuldok na lng ang probinsyana natin.....

Be proub to be a Bikolandia........

dagdag income para kisay?????

eman's picture

ya mapadakula ta ang KABAN NG BAYAN kung madagos ang coal mining sa catanduanes pwd man na makabawas ning unemployment rate sa catanduanes. Pero ang kadakulang kahaputan kisay makapunta ang EMO sa KABAN NG BAYAN????? para kaya sa binipisyo ta mga ordinaryon tawo o para sana sa mga buwaya sa capitolyo tsaka sa municipyo????

baging puro kita pandok emo na ha.

kung madagos ang coal mining sa catanduanes igwang dakulang buwaya ang sa likod kaan.bako ta gusto ning mga taga catanduanes or majority ta panu igwang politico ang naambunan ning under the table na huron2. di bali uso an sa pinas baga sisay man ang mataka kaan.

KABAN NG BAYAN????

ELVIERHOSE RODRIGUEZ's picture

para kaya sa binipisyo ta mga ordinaryon tawo o para sana sa mga buwaya sa capitolyo tsaka sa municipyo????

SPEAKING OF BUWAYA SA CAPITOLYO AT MUNICIPYO....... IGWA MAN PALA NING BUWAYA DYAN? KAHUNA KO SA MGA PULITIKO SANA IGWA KAINI PATI PALAN SA MUNICIPYO AT CAPITOLYO....

PAN-O PA KITA KAMI BAKA ASENSO KUNG PATI MGA BUWAYA DYAN SA CATANDUANES DAI KABAG-O... NATURE NA SIGURO INE NING MGA TAWO LALO NA PAG NASA KATUNGKULAN KA..

HAYYY BUHAY! TIGILAN NYO NA PANGUNGURAKOT NING KABAN NG BAYAN TA DAE MO MAN AN MADADALA SA PAGKAGADAN MO.... OPPPSS....BATO BATO SA LANGIT ANG TAMAAN AY MANGINGINIG.. WHEW!